2013-06-01 12:00 - Messages

Ne pas renverser

Guy Godin, conseiller de Via Prévention a donné une conférence fort suivie sur le renversement du chariot élévateur aux colloques de la CSST de Sept-Îles et Baie Comeau en mai dernier. Cette présentation démystifie les risques de renversement en illustrant la rêgle du triangle de sécurité. Voici une version de la présentation en format pdf.

Source : http://www.viaprevention.com/upload/aste/editor/asset/chariot%20elevateur_%20priere_de_ne_pas_renverser_guy_godin.pdf

 

CACES R 372 m catégorie 2. Pelles hydrauliques : Guide pour l'évaluation pratique

Ce guide s'adresse aux organismes testeurs certifiés et à leurs testeurs dits "personnes physiques", chargés de réaliser l'évaluation du savoir-faire des opérateurs pour la conduite en sécurité des pelles hydrauliques en vue de la délivrance du CACES R 372 m catégorie 2.
Il contient :
- le rappel du référentiel de connaissances et savoir-faire que le conducteur devra mettre en oeuvre pour la conduite en sécurité des engins de chantier ;
- une grille d'évaluation pratique ;
- un outil d'évaluation des savoir-faire décrits dans cette grille, sous forme de fiches correspondant aux différentes compétences à évaluer.

Source : http://www.inrs.fr/accueil/dms/inrs/CataloguePapier/ED/TI-ED-6137/ed6137.pdf

The effect of external non-driving factors, payment type and waiting and queuing on fatigue in long distance trucking

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of external influences on long distance trucking, in particular, incentive-based remuneration systems and the need to wait or queue to load or unload on driver experiences of fatigue. METHODS: Long distance truck drivers (n=475) were recruited at truck rest stops on the major transport corridors within New South Wales, Australia and asked to complete a survey by self-administration or interview. The survey covered demographics, usual working arrangements, details of the last trip and safety outcomes including fatigue experiences. RESULTS: On average drivers' last trip was over 2000km and took 21.5h to complete with an additional 6h of non-driving work. Incentive payments were associated with longer working hours, greater distances driven and higher fatigue for more drivers. Drivers required to wait in queues did significantly more non-driving work and experienced fatigue more often than those who did not. Drivers who were not paid to wait did the longest trips with average weekly hours above the legal working hours limits, had the highest levels of fatigue and the highest levels of interference by work with family life. In contrast, drivers who were paid to wait did significantly less work with shorter usual hours and shorter last trips. Multivariate analysis showed that incentive-based payment and unpaid waiting in queues were significant predictors of driver fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that mandating payment of drivers for non-driving work including waiting would reduce the amount of non-driving work required for drivers and reduce weekly hours of work. In turn this would reduce driver fatigue and safety risk as well as enhancing the efficiency of the long distance road transport industry.

Source : Williamson A, Friswell R. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013; 58C: 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.017
 

Abonnement courriel

Messages récents

Catégories

Mots-Clés (Tags)

Blogoliste

Archives